It looks like even the San Diego County family court is appalled by Six-Time Financial Felon Sharon Logan’s bizarre online harassment of Dr. SB’s family, and took a drastic step in response.
Their family court record is now sealed to the public. Completely. You can still get the case number in a name search (21FL010417N), but you can’t get any documents or even the case docket.
Disturbingly, it appears Logan, despite not being related to or friendly with anyone in the family, may even have attended the divorce court hearing where this was decided:
It’s tough to get a court to order that. There’s a strong First Amendment interest in having court records be public. Even Brad Pitt didn’t get a complete sealing of his divorce/custody battle. He only got a limited one after Angelina Jolie agreed to it, and he couldn’t even get the limited sealing on an emergency basis (ex parte). And the SB family isn’t famous, isn’t hounded by the press or anyone other than Logan.
That indicates Dr. SB’s ex, also a medical doctor, must have been equally distressed by the felonious, aspiring rescue celebrity’s online rantings about his divorce.
Worse, the court most likely found 6Time’s antics were harming the couple’s children. That’s the standard in these proceedings — the children’s well-being.
Targeting children is pretty low even for 6Time, who has an extensive history of conning and harassing adults. But such a finding would jibe with what we’ve seen in her blog and Facebook rants on this topic. We won’t even quote them to make fun of her, it’s so horrible.
It’s one thing to ridicule someone for botching an animal rescue effort. (We think that’s Logan’s issue with Dr. SB, anyway.) But who the hell goes after people’s kids?
Then again, 6Time didn’t show much concern for her own child’s well-being back during her Riverside County divorce in the late 1990s and early 2000s. She had four separate criminal cases for financial crimes before the child was 12, which sent Logan to prison — not jail, prison — at least two separate times.
One of the crimes was ID Theft from the child’s father, James Hecox. The others were embezzling $250,000 from her employer in Riverside County, embezzling from another employer in San Bernardino County, and stealing from some unlucky man, Todd B. (After the child turned 18, Logan committed another ID Theft misdemeanor, and her fifth and sixth financial felonies, in Orange County. See Logan’s criminal theft records on SlideShare, https://www.slideshare.net/TinaMarieTrujillo?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source=ssslideview
or in this post:
https://wordpress.com/post/fivetimefinancialfelon.com/3 )
But Logan’s bad behavior in her custody battle went beyond financial crimes, to harassment and false accusations against the child’s father and lying to police, as found by the court.
In 1997, the court granted the father, James Hecox, a permanent, three-year no-contact order against Logan (Case No RIC297701) after a contested hearing, due to her harassment and false accusations against him.
And in January, 2001, in the custody case, RID17256, the court found that Logan “lied to various law enforcement officers to have (Hecox) arrested.” Logan was in prison at the time, but still apparently determined to prevent her child’s father from parenting the 9-year-old.
Even before Logan went away to prison, the court stopped her visits altogether for several weeks.
Logan was also on monitored visits for a long time.
The father had sole custody for much of the child’s youth, even after 6Time worked her way up to weekend visits.
As the child entered the teen years, the father was dying, and agreed to give Logan custody.
Sources have said Logan claims to now have a close relationship with her adult child, and speaks proudly of the adult child, who is now 30 and appears respectably employed. Sometimes the apple does fall far from the tree.
Now, about that SB court file. You might ask: Hey Warning person, why were you trying to look up the SB family’s case? Hmmm? Well, mainly, we wanted to scrutinize Logan’s interpretations. She’s gotten things wrong before, like when she hollered about SB’s lawyer having a lien against her future financial settlement from the case, as if that weren’t standard in divorce cases. (It is.) Logan displays minimal understanding of legal issues, despite her many turns as a defendant.
We bet that if Logan hadn’t been quite such a hateful ranting idiot, especially regarding the children, she could have still posted the documents online, discussed them reasonably, and the court would have left the file open. But thanks to Logan’s unrestrained crapulence, now no one gets to see it.
Way to go, 6Time.
“Yeah, I lied a lot and stole a lot. Whaddya gonna do about it?”










Leave a comment